|
From:
The New York Building Congress
44 West 28th Street, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10001
Contact: Richard T. Anderson (212) 481-9230
Contact:
Rubenstein Associates, Inc.
Public Relations
Contact: Bud Perrone (212) 843-8068
For Immediate Release
Lirr Access to Grand Central Draws Vital
Support but Funding Difficulties Loom
New York, August 13, 1999
-- New York once again is undertaking a major effort to expand its
mass transit capacity after decades in which virtually all funding
was earmarked for restoration and upkeep of existing assets. This
is evidenced by the growing support for creation of Long Island
Rail Road (LIRR) access to Grand Central Terminal, an estimated
$4 billion project.
Key officials from Washington, Albany and the Metropolitan Transportation
Authority (MTA) demonstrated their backing for East Side Access
during a special New York Building Congress luncheon forum at the
Grand Hyatt on August 11th. Those who comprised the luncheon panel
-- U.S. Representatives Peter T. King and Gregory W. Meeks; State
Assemblywoman Catherine T. Nolan; State Senator Dean G. Skelos;
and LIRR President Thomas Prendergast -- all deemed the project
critical to the region's future prosperity and detailed the financial
commitments already in place in Albany and in Washington.
The East Side Access project will provide direct LIRR service to
Grand Central via the long-existing but unused LIRR level of the
63rd Street tunnel. It would call for the burrowing of deep rock
under the East River and construction of connectors to existing
LIRR tracks. The project currently is in the design stage, with
actual construction expected to begin in two years. Completion is
slated for 2009.
Each of the speakers warned, however, that full funding is far
from guaranteed and that the building community must continue to
be vocal in its advocacy and work closely with State and Federal
representatives over the next decade, if East Side Access is to
become a reality.
LIRR President Tom Prendergast, who called East Side Access "a
significant addition to the region's transportation infrastructure,"
noted that New York is fighting for limited federal funds. "We
need full TEA21 funding that is allocated through 2003 and continued
funding thereafter."
Congressman King, while noting that $44 million in prior federal
appropriations were released in June for the project and another
$4 million was added to the year 2000 appropriation, warned, "This
is going to be a struggle every year. The struggle will be in the
Senate." He said the New York delegation must resist annual
efforts by Senators from Western and Southern states to curtail
the flow of transportation funds slated for New York.
Congressman Meeks echoed these sentiments, adding that a current
Senate proposal would cap the percentage of transportation funds
any one state can attain. Such a provision, he said, would cost
New York State $200 million. "Projects like East Side Access
are critical to New York. Everyone in this room must contact federally
elected officials and demand funding. He added, "Work with
Senator Schumer, Representative King and myself. I believe collectively
we can make this project a reality," said Congressman Meeks.
State Senator Dean Skelos from Nassau County said New York "has
to have the vision to look down the road." He said Penn Station
is at capacity, and the Midtown Tunnel is overburdened. This project
is necessary to relieve congestion and maintain the economic viability
of both Long Island and New York City. Mass transit investment should
not end there, however. "The program is critically important,
but it doesn't mean we shouldn't be talking about the Second Avenue
Subway. All of this needs to happen. I look forward to working with
you as we start the next capital plan," added State Senator
Skelos, a member of the MTA Capital Review Board.
Assemblywoman Nolan, also a member of the MTA Capital Review Board,
praised the State's newfound desire to jump start major, forward-looking
infrastructure projects, but warned that tough days could be ahead
in Albany. "I am concerned that in this time of tax-cut mania,
funding for major projects may dry up. Dedicated revenues are in
jeopardy. I want to see a commitment to (keeping the transit system
in) a state of good repair but also to capacity expansion."
She added that other, non-monetary issues, also must be resolved,
such as integrating East Side Access with a Second Avenue Subway
line and the JFK rail link. She also cited the need to ensure that
residents in Queens, where the bulk of construction will take place,
will benefit from East Side Access as well as Long Island residents.
Michael Della Rocca, Co-chairman of the Building Congress' Transportation
and Infrastructure Committee, urged the building community to unite
behind this project. "We at the Building Congress are delighted
to see that our representatives are committed to a project, that
while critical, will not start showing benefits until ten years
down the road. While early signs are encouraging, we need to work
closely with our elected representatives in Washington and Albany
to ensure that the East Side Access program is not derailed in future
years."
The New York Building Congress is a non-partisan, 78-year-old public
policy coalition of business, labor, professional, association and
governmental organizations representing the design, construction
and real estate industry. Its 300 corporate, institutional and labor
union members comprise some 100,000 individuals.
|